![]() ![]() RISC-OS today is fairly healthy: Together with 3 others our company bought it from the old owners. Good documentation (admittedly red hat do a good job too) and a great support community, with some very knowledgeable people who have been around since Methuselah was a glint in the eye of the milkman. The OpenSUSE build service, which was a major step forward for packagers (other distros have similar services these days).ģ. You can still of course drop down to configuring raw files, this being Linux, but often it's safer and more convenient to go through a front-end interface.Ģ. YaST, both the fact that it's your go to for whatever admin work you require and the fact that it looks essentially the same whether you have X11 or a terminal. One of the desktops has been on tumbleweed for almost exactly ten years without a single glitch (well, apart from a noisy fan).Ī couple of great aspects of OpenSUSE, other than KDE, are:ġ. Tumbleweed runs on the office desktops, one laptop, and a few VPNs. I also have Leap on the backup laptop (always travel with two in case one gives up the ghost). The servers are set to self patch once a day, and I do major maintenance (usually a distro upgrade to the next version) once a year. I use Leap on servers and RPis (works great!) because of the relatively low maintenance effort. I also run both Leap and Tumbleweed, both very successfully. It's one release per year, which to me seems like a nice balance. I take issue a bit with the assertion that Leap updates are slow. Good to see a couple of discerning OpenSUSE users here. Windows might have been simpler, but why make things simple when you can be different? Personally, I ran RiscOS as long as I possibly could (still do for some things) and then went straight to openSUSE somewhere around version 12.n (there was a Mac in the house too, not mine). A friend has a second-hand device which seems to have a few things on it that it shouldn't, so a factory reset is in order methinks. Can't remember the last time.Īnd I'm about to start my very first MacOS "reinstallation". ![]() 15.2 to 15.3) is sometimes easier from the installation media, but I quite like the fact that in between versions it's relatively stable. Leap, slightly different in that a version upgrade (e.g. I haven't actually re-installed Tumbleweed from scratch on either of the two machines which currently run it, since I built them some four years ago, but I tend to put off updating until I can spare half an hour to double-check it isn't going to do something silly, which usually means once a month or so and also means doing it from the command line - not exactly newbie-friendly. I run openSUSE - both Leap and Tumbleweed - and have to say that the rolling release has improved hugely in the five or six years since I first tried it, when every second update would bork something, require a rollback, probably some kind of manual fix, or occasionally a re-install. The very idea of installing from scratch - particularly when not necessary - is ridiculous. to reinstall my OS from scratch every year or two (As a frame of reference, my adventures started with an early Red Hat Linux version running on an IBM PS/1 486.) There still remain plenty of rough edges that need sanding down, especially if you tread off the beaten path or have a "corner case" situation. This happens just enough to keep things interesting.Īs someone who has become annoyed with the directions that Windows and Mac OS have gone, I'm glad to see the major strides that major Linux distributions have made in user friendliness and ease of use over the past two decades. Over twenty years on, I still run into problems with Linux GUIs where the windows are too large and can't be shrunk down any further to fit the confines of the display resolution, so you can see and use all the elements within. It would be nice if low resolution displays were handled better. I'll grant that this wasn't a problem with anything being displayed, though it did prevent me from using the secondary display completely as intended. It would place calibration marks on the laptop's internal display, where they could not be touched.) (As I remember it, there was a built in calibration tool and I tried it to no improvement. This threw the calibration completely off. The displays themselves all worked fine, but it appeared as though the operating system was treating both displays as though they were touch capable. ![]() ![]() As an example, I have a touch input capable LCD monitor that I wanted to use with Linux Mint 20's xfce variant on a Dell Latitude D630. It's under some of the less common arrangements that I've run into trouble. (I tend to shy away from the lesser known offerings for reasons similar to those in the article.) With "conventional" multi-monitor setups, I've never had a problem with any major Linux distribution. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |